By Edgar Sánchez - The Port of Limon in Costa Rica, one of the biggest produce hubs worldwide, is to be extended considerably in a move that could seriously increase the prospects of smaller producers in the country. The redevelopment, which is in response to the work being done to increase traffic in the Panama Canal, would see increased traffic and space at the central American port. Edgar Sánchez, deputy director of the EU department of Costa Rican foreign trade body Procomer, told freshinfo that the government has been working on a new model for a container terminal to complement the Panama Canal as more traffic goes through it. The model will be published in the next few months and then bid on in a private-public deal through 2010 and 2011, with the goal of being fully built by 2014. Sánchez said: “We hope there will be more capacity in the port and more on-time shipping. At the moment, the big companies dominate the port and it's not uncommon for the little guys to be pushed out of a ship because the big guys own them, so hopefully with more capacity more exports all round can come through the port." (Source: Freshinfo)











The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) issued today, Friday, the order to proceed for the fourth and final dry excavation contract for the Pacific Access Channel (PAC-4). This contract is part of the program to expand the Panama Canal, with the total project valued at $5.25 billion dollars. The winning consortium submitted all required performance bonds for payment and insurance during the first ten days after the contract was awarded on 7 January 2010. Now, with this order to proceed, the consortium ICA-FCC-MECO has 1,288 calendar days to finish this important phase of the expansion project, which should conclude on or before 2 August 2013, according to a press release from the ACP. This channel, located on the West bank of the Canal between the Pedro Miguel and Miraflores locks, will complete the construction of a 6.1 kilometer long channel that will link the new third set of locks on the Pacific side of the Panama Canal to the Culebra Cut. This project also includes the excavation, removal and disposal of approximately 26 million cubic meters of material. The ACP awarded this contract to the consortium ICA-FCC-MECO, after the contractor submitted the lowest bid, complying with the requirements in the bid sheet. (Source: La Prensa)


By Joseph Bonney for the Journal of Commerce - When people gather to talk about the Port of New York and New Jersey, conversation almost inevitably turns to the port authority-owned Bayonne Bridge. The span's 151-foot vertical clearance is too low to allow the new generation of container ships to take full advantage of what will be 50-foot-deep channels to Port Newark/Elizabeth by 2012 and to New York Container Terminal on Staten Island by 2014. Port Director Rick Larrabee, told an industry audience Thursday night that the agency is determined to solve the bridge problem, but that such a huge fiscal and policy decision deserves careful examination. The port authority has commissioned a $10 million study of alternatives. These range from spending $2 billion to $3 billion or more on a new bridge or tunnel to an intriguing idea to redesign the existing bridge into a "lift" span that would raise the roadway to provide ships with more headroom. The feasibility of the "lift" alternative remains undetermined, but Larrabee said that because it might be done within three years at one-tenth the cost of a bridge replacement. Larrabee said the idea will receive close examination in the current study. "During the next 12 months, we'll run that one to ground," he said. With the Panama Canal's widening only five or six years away, the industry is getting antsy. There's even some talk about trying to persuade the port authority to demolish the bridge and divert Bayonne-Staten Island traffic to other bridges. An economic argument could be made for demolition -- traffic on the existing span totals only 22,000 vehicles a day. But don't look for it to happen. Demolishing a perfectly sound bridge, even to clear a critical navigation impediment, would tough to sell politically.
By WILFREDO S. JORDAN S. for La Prensa - The last step of the bidding process for the design and construction of the third set of locks was reached yesterday when the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) gave the order to proceed to the Grupo Unidos Por El Canal (GUPC). GUPC, led by the Spanish company Sacyr Vallehermoso, should begin work on August 25, 2009. After that date, the consortium has 1,883 days to deliver the new locks, in mid-2014. The consortium was awarded the contract to construct the third set of locks on July 15, for having the best technical expertise and the lowest price: $ 3.118 billion dollars. The ACP issued the order to proceed after completing the period specified in the project's schedule to start work, which included a review of the technical documentation and the qualifications of the various bids submitted. Based on this review, the consortium that came in second and offered a bid of $4.185 billion, Bechtel, Taisei, Mitsubishi Corporation, sent a note to the Minister for Canal Affairs Romulo Roux, warning about some technical shortcomings of the GUPC proposal. The CANAL consortium, which offered $5.981 billion, also sent a note to the ACP warning of an earthquake risk in the conceptual design of GUPC.
By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY - PANAMA CITY — Under leaden skies, mammoth yellow vehicles prowl an enormous gash in the earth. Excavators, bulldozers and loaders relentlessly carve the rippled black and brown ground, reshaping nature's handiwork. There's no sense of drama or romance or history. Nothing to suggest this sprawling site is anything special. But these workers are trying to improve upon one of the great engineering feats of history: the Panama Canal. On the other side of a nearby rise, the refrigerated cargo ship Cape Town Star, hauling fruit from Ecuador to Russia, is easing through the canal's almost century-old Miraflores Locks. Now, under a $5.25 billion project, the canal authority is adding a third lane to the ocean-spanning waterway that will double its capacity and allow access to the world's largest cargo-carrying vessels. "We are eliminating the restrictions the canal has imposed on the maritime industry. … The capability you have here, you have nowhere else in the world," says Alberto Aleman, the canal authority administrator. (more)
By Carlos Estrada Aguilar for La Critica - The group "United for the Canal" has to deliver a performance bond worth $450 million dollars to guarantee the work they will do after having won the public bid to build the third set of locks as part of the project to expand the Panama Canal. Once they deliver this bond then the contract will be signed and they will be given the order to proceed. The consortium submitted a bid for $3.118 billion dollars, and the work must be completed in 1,883 days or about 269 weeks. If they run over the alloted time the company will have to pay $300,000 dollars per day or a maximum of $54.6 million dollars in penalties. Thus far the project to expand the Panama Canal has created 2,500 direct jobs according to the Administrator of the Panama Canal Authority Alberto Alemán Zubieta in a report to the Deputies of the National Assembly who sit on the Canal Affairs Committee. Alemán Zubieta said 2011 will be the "peak period" of the project, and at that time they expect the project will generate more than 7,000 jobs. Alemán Zubieta said as work progresses on the areas of the Pacific and Atlantic sides of the waterway where excavation work is being conducted, more workers will be added to the widening project and there will be a significant impact on growth in the construction sector. The chairman of the Canal Affairs Committee, Luis Eduardo Quirós, recalled that when the expansion project was approved it was established that the Minister of Canal Affairs and the Administrator of the ACP should present a quarterly report detailing the progress of the work to ensure the transparency of the project. The Minister for Canal Affairs Romulo Roux was also present at the National Assembly. (See Comments) 

